Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PurposeTo identify the specific intratumoral and microenvironmental heterogeneity of acral melanoma (AM) and mucosal melanoma (MM), we aimed to delineate their distinct cellular compositions, evolutionary trajectories, and subtype-specific therapeutic strategies.Experimental designSingle-cell transcriptomic and genomic landscapes were analyzed across 42 melanoma (28 AM, 11 MM, and 3 nonacral cutaneous melanoma) samples, supplemented by in vitro and in vivo validation. Tumor and stromal cells were profiled using single-cell RNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and functional assays, including transwell migration, co-culture systems, and xenograft models.ResultsTumor cells exhibited divergent evolutionary routes, with MM dominated by MGP+/PCOLCE+ subpopulations showing high epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition potential. MM displayed elevated neutrophil infiltration and CXCL3+ tumor-associated macrophages, whereas AM was enriched with PI16+ cancer-associated fibroblasts promoting tumor proliferation. Molecular classification revealed MM subtypes: an antigen-presenting subtype linked to favorable outcomes and a proliferative subtype associated with recurrence. TIGIT+ regulatory T cells were enriched in AM, suggesting targeted inhibition potential. Genomic analysis connected BRAF/NRAS mutations to ALDOA+ stem-like tumor cells and identified prostaglandin D2 synthetase as a therapeutic target in triple-wild-type/melanomas.ConclusionsOur study provides a comprehensive comparison of AM and MM, uncovering subtype-specific stromal-immune interactions and molecular programs. The findings highlight actionable targets (e.g., TIGIT in AM and CXCL3+ macrophages in MM) and propose a framework for precision therapies, biomarker-driven trials, and risk stratification to improve outcomes in these aggressive melanomas.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3164

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2025-06-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

31

Pages

2495 - 2514

Total pages

19

Addresses

S, k, i, n, , D, i, s, e, a, s, e, , R, e, s, e, a, r, c, h, , I, n, s, t, i, t, u, t, e, ,, , T, h, e, , S, e, c, o, n, d, , A, f, f, i, l, i, a, t, e, d, , H, o, s, p, i, t, a, l, ,, , Z, h, e, j, i, a, n, g, , U, n, i, v, e, r, s, i, t, y, , S, c, h, o, o, l, , o, f, , M, e, d, i, c, i, n, e, ,, , H, a, n, g, z, h, o, u, ,, , C, h, i, n, a, .

Keywords

Mucous Membrane, Cell Line, Tumor, Animals, Humans, Mice, Melanoma, Skin Neoplasms, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genetic Heterogeneity, Female, Male, Single-Cell Analysis, Tumor Microenvironment, Transcriptome, Biomarkers, Tumor, Exome Sequencing