Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

SummaryBackgroundIn 2008, the European Respiratory Society Task Force proposed the terms multiple‐trigger wheeze (MTW) and episodic (viral) wheeze (EVW) for children with wheezing episodes. We determined MTW and EVW prevalence, their 24‐month stability and predictiveness for asthma.MethodsIn total, 565 preschoolers (1‐, 2‐ and 3‐year‐olds) in primary care with respiratory symptoms were followed until the age of 6 years when asthma was diagnosed. MTW status and EVW status were determined using questionnaire data collected at baseline and after one and 2 years. We distinguished 3 phenotypes and determined their 24‐month stability, also accounting for treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Logistic regression was used to analyse the phenotypes’ associations with asthma.ResultsTwo hundred and eighty‐one children had complete information. MTW and EVW were stable in 10 of 281 (3.6%) and 24 of 281 (8.5%), respectively. The odds of developing asthma for children with stable MTW and stable EVW were 14.4 (1.7–119) and 3.6 (1.2–11.3) times greater than those for children free of wheeze (for at least 1 year). ICS was associated with increased stability of MTW and EVW.ConclusionsStable multiple‐trigger and stable episodic viral wheeze are relatively uncommon. However, 1‐ to 3‐year‐olds with stable MTW are at much increased risk of asthma.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1111/cea.12660

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

2016-06-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

46

Pages

837 - 847

Total pages

10