Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Abstract CDC4/FBXW7 is part of a ubiquitin ligase complex which targets molecules such as cyclin E, c-myc, and c-jun for destruction. CDC4 mutations occur in several cancer types and are best described in colorectal tumors. Knockout of CDC4 in vitro in colorectal cancer cells causes changes suggestive of chromosomal instability (CIN). In p53+/− mice, radiation-induced lymphomas show deletion or mutation of one copy of CDC4 and knockdown of CDC4 leads to increased aneuploidy in mouse fibroblasts. We screened 244 colorectal tumors and 40 cell lines for CDC4 mutations and allelic loss. Six percent (18 of 284) of tumors, including near-diploid (CIN−) lesions, harbored CDC4 mutations and there was no association between mutation and CIN (polyploidy). The CDC4 mutation spectrum in colorectal tumors was heavily biased towards C:G>T:A changes, either missense mutations at critical arginine residues or nonsense changes in the 5′ half of the gene. The reasons for this odd mutation spectrum were unclear but C:G>T:A changes were not found more often than expected at APC, K-ras, or p53 in the same tumors and we found no specific defects in DNA repair to account for the observations. No colorectal tumor was found to carry two CDC4 mutations predicted to abolish protein function; partial loss of CDC4 function may therefore cause tumorigenesis. The in vitro studies, therefore, did not assess the functional effects of mutant alleles which are found in vivo. CDC4 mutations may be selected primarily to drive progression through the cell cycle although CIN might be an important secondary effect in some cancers. (Cancer Res 2005; 65(24): 11361-6)

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-2565

Type

Journal article

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Publication Date

2005-12-15T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

65

Pages

11361 - 11366

Total pages

5