Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AbstractBackground and objectiveObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent and associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. Endothelial dysfunction is the proposed causative mechanism. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is presumed to improve cardiovascular outcome in OSA. CPAP withdrawal was recently shown to lead to peripheral endothelial dysfunction. However, it is not known whether short‐term CPAP withdrawal reduces myocardial perfusion in OSA.MethodsIn this double‐blind randomized controlled study, 45 patients with moderate to severe OSA previously adherent to CPAP were assigned to either subtherapeutic or continuing therapeutic CPAP for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was adenosine‐induced myocardial blood flow (MBF) as a measure of endothelial function, assessed by 13N‐ammonia positron emission tomography. Secondary outcomes were measures of dermal and renal microvascular function, morning blood pressure (BP) and heart rate.ResultsDespite return of OSA associated with significant increases in BP (+9.1 mm Hg, 95% CI +4.9 to +13.4 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and heart rate (+9.6 bpm, 95% confidence interval (CI) +4.6 to +14.6 bpm, P < 0.001), CPAP withdrawal had no significant effect on maximal myocardial perfusion capacity (hyperaemic MBF −0.01 ml/min/g, 95% CI −0.33 to +0.24 ml/min/g, P = 0.91), nor renal and dermal microvascular function.ConclusionIn patients with OSA, a short‐term CPAP withdrawal does not lead to detectable impairment of coronary endothelial function, as has been demonstrated in the brachial artery, despite a clinically relevant increase in BP of nearly 10 mm Hg. There was also no evidence of an impairment of renal or dermal microvascular function.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1111/resp.12798

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

2016-08-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

21

Pages

1126 - 1133

Total pages

7