Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AbstractIn most cohort studies on HIV infection and AIDS, data on time from seroconversion to AIDS or death are doubly censored, both at the time origin and at the endpoint of interest. In epidemiological research, the most frequently adopted approach is to restrict the analysis to persons with narrow seroconversion intervals and to impute the midpoint of this interval as date of seroconversion. For many cohort studies, the consequence is that a substantial proportion of the data is not used. We consider four methods that are expected to be less biased when all cohort data are used: two imputation methods, conditional mean and multiple imputation, and two likelihood maximization methods. We derive the likelihood structure of the cohort data and clarify its dependence on study design. All methods are applied to data from the Amsterdam cohort study among injection drug users. In a simulation study the data generation process of this cohort study is imitated. The performance of midpoint, conditional mean and multiple imputation are compared. With midpoint imputation, both an analysis using the full data set, as well as one restricted to the cases with small seroconversion intervals, is performed. Conditional mean imputation comes out as the preferred method. It gives best results with respect to mean squared error. Moreover, when confidence intervals are computed through standard methods that ignore the uncertainty in the imputed date of seroconversion, coverage probabilities are almost correct. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1002/sim.700

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

2001-03-15T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

20

Pages

795 - 812

Total pages

17