Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Abstract The “suspension phenomenon” describes terminally ill patients caught in limbo within the end-of-life care system, uncertain where to seek appropriate treatment. While Western literature has problematized the binary of home vs. hospital deaths, such framing remains underexplored in Asian contexts. We aim to examine how and why patients and families in China make decisions about the place of end-of-life care and death, and to identify the barriers and facilitators that shape access to different care settings, using qualitative content analysis of death narratives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 225 bereaved family caregivers across multiple sites in China, using a Voluntary Cooperative Network Research approach that mobilized multidisciplinary volunteer researchers. Six decision-making approaches were identified: respecting patient preference, pursuing survival, resisting medical authority, prioritizing symptom relief, fulfilling filial duty, and consulting informal medical networks. Seven barriers contributed to suspension: mistrust in local services, financial hardship, facility rejection, inadequate palliative provision, non-disclosure to patients, dilemmas around medical technologies, and COVID-19 disruptions. Five care-seeking patterns emerged: aggressive rescue, intensive caregiving, returning home to die, treatment abandonment, and pursuit of a “good death.” Findings challenge normative assumptions about place of death, revealing how sociocultural, economic and technological factors shape end-of-life trajectories in contemporary China.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1515/ajmedh-2025-0033

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Publication Date

2025-01-29T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

4