Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AbstractGenetic surveillance of malaria parasites supports malaria control programmes, treatment guidelines and elimination strategies. Surveillance studies often pose questions about malaria parasite ancestry (e.g. how antimalarial resistance has spread) and employ statistical methods that characterise parasite population structure. Many of the methods used to characterise structure are unsupervised machine learning algorithms which depend on a genetic distance matrix, notably principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC).PCoA and HAC are sensitive to both the definition of genetic distance and algorithmic specification. Importantly, neither algorithm infers malaria parasite ancestry. As such, PCoA and HAC can inform (e.g. via exploratory data visualisation and hypothesis generation), but not answer comprehensively, key questions about malaria parasite ancestry.We illustrate the sensitivity of PCoA and HAC using 393 Plasmodium falciparum whole genome sequences collected from Cambodia and neighbouring regions (where antimalarial resistance has emerged and spread recently) and we provide tentative guidance for the use and interpretation of PCoA and HAC in malaria parasite genetic epidemiology. This guidance includes a call for fully transparent and reproducible analysis pipelines that feature (i) a clearly outlined scientific question; (ii) a clear justification of analytical methods used to answer the scientific question along with discussion of any inferential limitations; (iii) publicly available genetic distance matrices when downstream analyses depend on them; and (iv) sensitivity analyses. To bridge the inferential disconnect between the output of non-inferential unsupervised learning algorithms and the scientific questions of interest, tailor-made statistical models are needed to infer malaria parasite ancestry. In the absence of such models speculative reasoning should feature only as discussion but not as results.Author summaryGenetic epidemiology studies of malaria attempt to characterise what is happening in malaria parasite populations. In particular, they are an important tool to track the spread of drug resistance and to validate genetic makers of drug resistance. To make sense of parasite genetic data, researchers usually characterise the population structure using statistical methods. This is most often done as a two step process. The first is a data reduction step, whereby the data are summarised into a distance matrix (each entry represents the genetic distance between two isolates) and then the distance matrix is input into an unsupervised machine learning algorithm. Principal coordinates analysis and hierarchical agglomerative clustering are the two most popular unsupervised machine learning algorithms used for this purpose in malaria genetic epidemiology. We illustrate that this procedure is sensitive to the choice of genetic distance and to the specification of the algorithms. These unsupervised methods are useful for exploratory data analysis but cannot be used to infer historical events. We provide some guidance on how to make genetic epidemiology analyses more transparent and reproducible.

Original publication




Journal article

Publication Date