Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundFeNO may have a role as both a prognostic and predictive biomarker in combination with eosinophils for assessing responsiveness to some biological therapies.ObjectiveWe evaluated the value of baseline FeNO, adjusted for baseline blood eosinophil levels and other clinical characteristics, as an independent predictor of treatment response to dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma.MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST (NCT02414854), a phase 3, double-blind study in patients aged 12 years and older with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma, who received dupilumab 200 or 300 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks up to 52 weeks. We assessed the annualized event rate of severe exacerbations and least-squares mean change from baseline in prebronchodilator FEV1 at weeks 12 and 52 in relationship to baseline FeNO, adjusted for eosinophils and other clinical characteristics.ResultsThe annualized event rate increased with increasing baseline FeNO in placebo and decreased in dupilumab groups. The relative risk of severe exacerbations was 22·7%, 58·3%, and 69·3% lower for dupilumab versus placebo for the FeNO less than 25, 25 to less than 50, and 50 and greater parts per billion subgroups. The magnitude of FEV1 improvement increased with higher baseline FeNO for dupilumab and was consistent across the continuum of FeNO levels in placebo. Both findings were independent of blood eosinophil levels. Significant differences were observed between FeNO subgroups.ConclusionsIncreased baseline FeNO was associated with greater clinical effects in dupilumab versus placebo independently of eosinophil levels and other clinical characteristics.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.jaip.2022.11.043

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2023-04-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

11

Pages

1213 - 1220.e2

Addresses

U, n, i, v, e, r, s, i, t, y, , o, f, , O, x, f, o, r, d, , a, n, d, , O, x, f, o, r, d, , R, e, s, p, i, r, a, t, o, r, y, , N, a, t, i, o, n, a, l, , I, n, s, t, i, t, u, t, e, , f, o, r, , H, e, a, l, t, h, , a, n, d, , C, a, r, e, , R, e, s, e, a, r, c, h, , B, i, o, m, e, d, i, c, a, l, , R, e, s, e, a, r, c, h, , C, e, n, t, r, e, ,, , O, x, f, o, r, d, ,, , U, n, i, t, e, d, , K, i, n, g, d, o, m, ., , E, l, e, c, t, r, o, n, i, c, , a, d, d, r, e, s, s, :, , i, a, n, ., p, a, v, o, r, d, @, n, d, m, ., o, x, ., a, c, ., u, k, .

Keywords

Eosinophils, Humans, Asthma, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Respiratory Function Tests, Double-Blind Method, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized