Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Countries in the Greater Mekong sub-region (GMS) have been encouraged to deploy mass chloroquine treatments given monthly for four months to reduce the burden of vivax malaria. This paper summarizes briefly current knowledge on Plasmodium vivax epidemiology, the biology of vivax relapse and previous experience using dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine mass treatments in the GMS to show why this approach would be extremely cost-ineffective. Around 800 full treatment courses in 200 people would be needed to prevent one symptomatic case. Mass chloroquine treatment will contribute little or nothing to the elimination of vivax malaria in this area.

Original publication

DOI

10.1186/s12936-025-05399-2

Type

Journal article

Journal

Malar J

Publication Date

26/05/2025

Volume

24

Keywords

Plasmodium vivax, Chloroquine, Elimination, Mass drug administration, Malaria, Vivax, Chloroquine, Humans, Antimalarials, Plasmodium vivax, Mass Drug Administration, Piperazines, Quinolines, Artemisinins