Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Abstract.  Pyrethroid‐impregnated bednets and curtains are widely employed to reduce the risk of malaria transmission, but pyrethroid‐resistance is becoming more prevalent among malaria vector Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). As an alternative treatment for curtains, we assessed carbosulfan (a carbamate insecticide) in comparison with permethrin as the standard pyrethroid, against endophilic female mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex in a village near Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. The main criterion evaluated was the impact of curtains (hung inside windows, eaves and doorways) on the number of An. gambiae s.l. females active indoors at night. Light‐traps were operated overnight (21.00–06.00 hours beside occupied untreated bednets) to sample mosquitoes in houses fitted with net curtains treated with carbosulfan 0.2 g ai/m2 or permethrin 1 g ai/m2 or untreated, compared with houses without curtains. The treated and untreated curtains significantly reduced the numbers of mosquitoes collected indoors, compared with houses without curtains. Carbosulfan‐treated curtains had a highly significantly greater effect than permethrin‐treated or untreated curtains, the scale of the difference being estimated as three‐fold. However, there was no significant difference between the impact of untreated and permethrin‐treated curtains on densities of An. gambiae s.l. trapped indoors. Samples of the An. gambiae complex comprised An. arabiensis Patton and both the S‐ and M‐forms of An. gambiae Giles s.s. Susceptibility tests revealed some resistance to DDT and low frequencies of permethrin‐resistance, insufficient to explain the poor performance of permethrin on curtains. Among survivors from the diagnostic dosage of permethrin were some specimens of all three members of the An. gambiae complex, but the kdr resistance mechanism was detected only in the S‐form of An. gambiae s.s. Questions arising for further investigation include clarification of resistance mechanisms in, and foraging behaviour of, each member of the An. gambiae complex in this situation and the need to decide whether carbosulfan‐treated curtains are acceptably safe for use to reduce risks of malaria transmission.

Original publication

DOI

10.1046/j.1365-2915.2003.00450.x

Type

Journal

Medical and Veterinary Entomology

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

09/2003

Volume

17

Pages

333 - 338