Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Rapid expansion of antiretroviral therapy in Malawi has occurred in the relative absence of suitable pediatric CD4 counting facilities. We have recently validated in adults a simplified affordable flow cytometric CD4 counting method, the Blantyre count. There is a need for this technology to transfer to government laboratories run by local staff, and to be validated in children, where %CD4/lymphocyte values are required. METHODS: We assessed agreement of %CD4/lymphocyte values determined by the Blantyre count and Panleucogate methods on an EPICS XL-MCL flow cytometer on 113 venous blood samples from HIV-seropositive children in Blantyre, Malawi. All assays were performed by two Malawian laboratory technicians. RESULTS: Overall bias between the two methods was -0.13% (95% CI -0.37 to 0.11) and limits of agreement were -2.69 to 2.43% (95% CI -3.11 to -2.27 and 2.01 to 2.85). Limits of agreement were within -3.00 and 3.00 for each laboratory technician. Coefficient of variation for the Blantyre count assay was 2.0% and samples showed good stability over 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The Blantyre count method can accurately determine %CD4/lymphocyte values in blood of HIV-seropositive children on an EPIC XL-MCL flow cytometer at a reagent cost of US $0.21 per test or less. The assay can be competently carried out by local laboratory technicians.

Original publication




Journal article


Cytometry B Clin Cytom

Publication Date



74 Suppl 1


S90 - S97


Bias, Blood Specimen Collection, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Infant, Malawi, Male, Observer Variation, Reproducibility of Results, Software