Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

ObjectiveTo evaluate factors affecting unselected population-based BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews (AJ).DesignCohort-study set within recruitment to the GCaPPS trial (ISRCTN73338115).SettingNorth London AJ population.Population or sampleAshkenazi Jews women/men >18 years, recruited through self-referral.MethodsAshkenazi Jews women/men underwent pre-test counselling for BRCA testing through recruitment clinics (clusters). Consenting individuals provided blood samples for BRCA testing. Data were collected on socio-demographic/family history/knowledge/psychological well-being along with benefits/risks/cultural influences (18-item questionnaire measuring 'attitude'). Four-item Likert-scales analysed initial 'interest' and 'intention-to-test' pre-counselling. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated factors affecting uptake/interest/intention to undergo BRCA testing. Statistical inference was based on cluster robust standard errors and joint Wald tests for significance. Item-Response Theory and graded-response models modelled responses to 18-item questionnaire.Main outcome measuresInterest, intention, uptake, attitude towards BRCA testing.ResultsA total of 935 individuals (women = 67%/men = 33%; mean age = 53.8 (SD = 15.02) years) underwent pre-test genetic-counselling. During the pre-counselling, 96% expressed interest in and 60% indicated a clear intention to undergo BRCA testing. Subsequently, 88% opted for BRCA testing. BRCA-related knowledge (P = 0.013) and degree-level education (P = 0.01) were positively and negatively (respectively) associated with intention-to-test. Being married/cohabiting had four-fold higher odds for BRCA testing uptake (P = 0.009). Perceived benefits were associated with higher pre-counselling odds for interest in and intention to undergo BRCA testing. Reduced uncertainty/reassurance were the most important factors contributing to decision-making. Increased importance/concern towards risks/limitations (confidentiality/insurance/emotional impact/inability to prevent cancer/marriage ability/ethnic focus/stigmatisation) were significantly associated with lower odds of uptake of BRCA testing, and discriminated between acceptors and decliners. Male gender/degree-level education (P = 0.001) had weaker correlations, whereas having children showed stronger (P = 0.005) associations with attitudes towards BRCA testing.ConclusionsBRCA testing in the AJ population has high acceptability. Pre-test counselling increases awareness of disadvantages/limitations of BRCA testing, influencing final cost-benefit perception and decision-making on undergoing testing.Tweetable abstractBRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews has high acceptability and uptake. Pre-test counselling facilitates informed decision-making.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/1471-0528.15654

Type

Journal article

Journal

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology

Publication Date

05/2019

Volume

126

Pages

784 - 794

Addresses

Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Keywords

Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Attitude to Health, Genetic Counseling, Mutation, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Cultural Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Adult, Jews, Patient Participation, London, Female, Male, Genetic Testing, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome